A short AI-narrated film with English captions. Pressing play loads the YouTube player. Watch on YouTube
Guide Origin: Community | ArcKit Version: [VERSION]
/arckit:eu-dora generates a DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act, Regulation EU 2022/2554) compliance assessment for financial sector entities. DORA has applied since 17 January 2025. For the financial entities in its scope it applies instead of NIS2's cybersecurity risk-management, reporting and supervision provisions, though not instead of NIS2 as a whole (see Key Notes).
Inputs
| Artefact | Purpose |
|---|---|
Requirements (ARC-<id>-REQ-v1.0.md) |
Financial service type and ICT dependencies |
| Risk register | ICT risks and existing resilience measures |
| Secure by Design | Existing security architecture |
Command
/arckit:eu-dora Assess DORA compliance for <financial entity type>
In Claude Code the overlay installs as its own plugin, arckit-eu, so the command is /arckit-eu:eu-dora.
Output: projects/<id>/ARC-<id>-DORA-v1.0.md
Assessment Structure
| Section | Contents |
|---|---|
| Entity Classification | Credit institution / insurer / investment firm / etc. |
| ICT Risk Management | 5-pillar framework (Art. 5–16) |
| Incident Classification | Major ICT-related incident criteria (RTS) |
| Incident Reporting | 4h → 72h → 1-month final report |
| TLPT | Threat-Led Penetration Testing obligation (significant institutions) |
| Third-Party Management | Critical ICT provider designation and contractual requirements |
| Information Sharing | Threat intelligence sharing arrangements |
| Oversight Framework | ESA (EBA / ESMA / EIOPA) supervision |
| Gap Analysis | Gaps with priority and DORA deadline |
DORA 5 ICT Risk Pillars
| Pillar | Key Requirements |
|---|---|
| Governance & Strategy | Management body accountability, ICT strategy |
| Risk Management | ICT risk framework, asset management |
| Incident Reporting | Classification, timeline, RTS compliance |
| Resilience Testing | TLPT for significant institutions, scenario-based testing |
| Third-Party Risk | Due diligence, contractual minimum clauses, exit plans |
One-Page Workflow
| Phase | Key Activities | ArcKit Commands |
|---|---|---|
| Discovery | Entity and ICT dependency mapping | /arckit:requirements |
| Risk | ICT risk assessment | /arckit:risk |
| Assessment | DORA compliance assessment | /arckit:eu-dora |
| Security | Technical controls | /arckit:secure |
Review Checklist
- Entity type confirmed as DORA in-scope (credit institution, insurer, investment firm, AISP/PISP, crypto-asset service provider, etc.).
- All 5 ICT risk management pillars assessed.
- Major incident classification criteria documented (4h early warning threshold).
- TLPT obligation assessed (significant institution criteria).
- Critical ICT third-party providers identified (contractual minimum clauses per Annex).
- ESA competent authority identified (EBA / ESMA / EIOPA depending on entity type).
Key Notes
- France: DORA supervised by ACPR (banking/insurance) and AMF (investment firms).
- NIS2 relationship: DORA is lex specialis to NIS2 (DORA recital 16) and a sector-specific Union legal act under NIS2 Article 4 (DORA Art. 1(2)). For the financial entities it covers, DORA's rules on ICT risk management, incident reporting, resilience testing, information sharing and third-party risk apply instead of NIS2's risk-management, reporting and supervision provisions (NIS2 recital 28). NIS2 is not switched off entirely: the entity can still be identified as essential or important under national NIS2 law, group entities or services in a NIS2 sector outside DORA stay under NIS2 (NIS2 Art. 4(1)), and the competent authority passes major-incident details to the NIS2 CSIRTs, competent authorities or single points of contact (DORA Art. 19(6)). Run
/arckit:eu-nis2for any part of the group DORA does not cover. - TLPT: Threat-Led Penetration Testing follows TIBER-EU methodology; only required for significant institutions designated by competent authorities.